The
paper focuses on the discussion of social freedom in the family in Axel
Honneth's most recent book Freedom's Right. I argue, on the one hand, that
radical democrats have much to learn from Honneth's method of normative
reconstruction because it provides a much needed corrective to the “social
weightlessness” that characterizes their thought about democracy. In contrast
to the current preoccupation with rarefied issues of political ontology,
Freedom's Right exemplifies a type of sociologically attuned thinking that is
essential for addressing issues of power and inequality. On the other hand, I
argue that Honneth's reliance on a teleological notion of historical progress
has deeply constraining effects on his critique of power. First, in so far as
it underestimates the impact of growing social inequality on personal and
intimate relations, it fails to acknowledge just how extensive, radical and,
potentially deeply contentious the political measures needed to realize social
freedom in the family may have to be. Second, Honneth's teleological
reconstruction provides too thin a basis to generate substantive normative
solutions to issues of social justice in the family. Third, teleology tends to
depoliticize the process of emancipatory social change by construing it in
terms of impersonal mechanisms and developmental tendencies rather than as
open-ended, often polemical and deeply contested forms of political struggle.
Website: http://www.arjonline.org/social-sciences-and-humanities/american-research-journal-of-humanities-and-social-sciences/
Website: http://www.arjonline.org/social-sciences-and-humanities/american-research-journal-of-humanities-and-social-sciences/
No comments:
Post a Comment