I
start out by giving a brief account of the four premises of the method of
normative reconstruction and unpack their implications for how Honneth
conceptualizes social pathologies and misdevelopments, specifically that these
notions are no longer linked to radical critique and normative revolution. In
the second part, I demonstrate that abandoning forms of radical critique and
normative revolution is internally linked to adopting this method, before
arguing that Freedom's Right contains no resources to account for why abandoning
them does not amount to a deficiency. In the final part, I point out two
problematic implications of turning away from radical critique and normative
revolution for the very project Honneth pursues in Freedom's Right. I show that
Honneth's own view about the limited scope of application of the method of
normative reconstruction and his account of the dangers associated with social
misdevelopments give us (additional) reasons to consider this method to be
incomplete. Finally, I contend that the explanatory power of Freedom's Right is
dubious because methodological premises that form part of normative
reconstruction lead Honneth to ignore relevant alternative explanations of
processes of deviation and disassociation from norms of social freedom, which
he characterizes as social misdevelopments.
Website: http://www.arjonline.org/social-sciences-and-humanities/american-research-journal-of-humanities-and-social-sciences/
Website: http://www.arjonline.org/social-sciences-and-humanities/american-research-journal-of-humanities-and-social-sciences/